4.7 Article

Membrane Tethering of SepF, a Membrane Anchor for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Z-ring

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 434, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167817

Keywords

membrane binding; intrinsically disordered regions; membrane anchor; cell division; Z-ring

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. [GM118091]
  3. [AI119178]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, molecular dynamics simulations were used to reveal how the membrane anchor protein SepF in Mycobacterium tuberculosis binds to acidic membranes and stabilizes the interaction between the Z-ring and the membrane during bacterial cell division, leading to the recruitment of other membrane proteins.
Bacterial cell division begins with the formation of the Z-ring via polymerization of FtsZ and the localization of Z-ring beneath the inner membrane through membrane anchors. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), SepF is one such membrane anchor, but our understanding of the underlying mechanism is very limited. Here we used molecular dynamics simulations to characterize how SepF itself, a water-soluble protein, tethers to acidic membranes that mimic the Mtb inner membrane. In addition to an amphipathic helix (resi-dues 1-12) at the N-terminus, membrane binding also occurs through two stretches of positively charged residues (Arg27-Arg37 and Arg95-Arg107) in the long linker preceding the FtsZ-binding core domain (resi-dues 128-218). The additional interactions via the disordered linker stabilize the membrane tethering of SepF, and keep the core domain of SepF and hence the attached Z-ring close to the membrane. The resulting membrane proximity of the Z-ring in turn enables its interactions with and thus recruitment of two membrane proteins, FtsW and CrgA, at the late stage of cell division.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available