4.7 Article

The acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-testing: A cross-sectional study in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28227

Keywords

intention; protective motivation theory; rapid antigen self-testing; SARS-CoV-2; structural equation model

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared to nucleic acid amplification test (NATT), SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-testing (RAST) offers advantages in terms of speed and convenience. A study conducted in China found that 62.5% of participants were willing to accept SARS-CoV-2 RAST. Acceptance varied significantly based on residence, education level, occupation, monthly income, travel frequency, and perceptions of NATT. Factors such as response efficacy and self-efficacy positively influenced acceptance, while response cost had a negative effect. Concerns regarding reliability, testing method, price, and authority were identified among the public. The extended protective motivation theory (PMT) can be used to predict intention to accept RAST. Measures should be taken to increase acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 RAST.
Compared with the nucleic acid amplification test (NATT), the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rapid antigen self-testing (RAST) has advantages in speed and convenience. However, little is known about people's acceptance and influencing factors for SARS-CoV-2 RAST. A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 21 to 30, 2022 in China. The chi(2) test and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify the influencing factors. The structural equation model was used to test the extended protective motivation theory (PMT) model hypotheses. Among the total of 5107 participants, 62.5% were willing to accept the SARS-CoV-2 RAST. There were significant differences in acceptance among different residences (p < 0.001), educational level (p < 0.001), occupation (p < 0.001), monthly income (p < 0.001), travel frequency (p < 0.05), and feelings about NATT (p < 0.001). Response efficacy (beta = 0.05; p = 0.025) and self-efficacy (beta = 0.84; p < 0.001) had a positive effect, while response cost showed a negative effect (beta = -0.07; p < 0.001). The public's major concerns about SARS-CoV-2 RAST are its reliability, testing method, price, and authority. Overall, a moderate intention to use SARS-CoV-2 RAST was found among the Chinese population. The extended PMT can be used for the prediction of intention to accept the RAST. We need to take measures to increase people's acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 RAST.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available