4.5 Article

A founder UMOD variant is a common cause of hereditary nephropathy in the British population

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 397-405

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108704

Keywords

founder effect; genetics; population; mutation; genetic counseling; diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the finding of an unusual uromodulin (UMOD) variant in multiple pedigrees within the British population and demonstrate a shared haplotype indicative of an ancestral variant. This variant may be more common in white British ethnicity patients with kidney failure.
Background Monogenic disorders are estimated to account for 10%-12% of patients with kidney failure. We report the unexpected finding of an unusual uromodulin (UMOD) variant in multiple pedigrees within the British population and demonstrate a shared haplotype indicative of an ancestral variant. Methods Probands from 12 apparently unrelated pedigrees with a family history of kidney failure within a geographically contiguous UK region were shown to be heterozygous for a pathogenic variant of UMOD c.278_289delTCTGCCCCGAAG insCCGCCTCCT. Results A total of 88 clinically affected individuals were identified, all born in the UK and of white British ethnicity. 20 other individuals with the variant were identified in the UK 100,000 Genomes (100K) Project and 9 from UK Biobank (UKBB). A common extended haplotype was present in 5 of the UKBB individuals who underwent genome sequencing which was only present in <1 in 5000 of UKBB controls. Significantly, rare variants (<1 in 250 general population) identified within 1 Mb of the UMOD variant by genome sequencing were detected in all of the 100K individuals, indicative of an extended shared haplotype. Conclusion Our data confirm a likely founder UMOD variant with a wide geographical distribution within the UK. It should be suspected in cases of unexplained familial nephropathy presenting in patients of white British ancestry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available