4.6 Article

Rational design of three-dimensional MXene-based aerogel for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 57, Issue 39, Pages 18549-18560

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-07762-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975058, 52063014, 22101244]
  2. Qingchuang Technology Support Program [2020KJC002]
  3. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province [tsqn201909087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a three-dimensional MXene-based aerogel as a sulfur host and functional separator, the performance of lithium-sulfur batteries can be significantly improved, achieving high reversible specific capacity, excellent rate capability, and long-term cycling stability.
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery with high energy density is attracting more and more attention as a candidate battery for high-energy power supply in the coming new energy era. However, several defects, such as the insulation properties and shuttle effect of sulfur species, greatly hinder its application. Herein, we rationally design a three-dimensional MXene-based aerogel with a surface area of 221 m(2) g(-1) and use it as a sulfur host and functional separator for Li-S battery. In the preparation strategy of MXene-based aerogel, Ti3C2Tx and melamine-formaldehyde resin are integrated into a three-dimensional interconnected porous network structure. As the sulfur host, MXene-based aerogel-derived sulfur cathode shows a highly reversible specific capacity of 1042 mA h g(-1) at 0.1 C, excellent rate capability, and long-term cycling stability. Furthermore, the modified separator made by coating MXene-based aerogel on the commercial separator has been applied to Li-S battery. Compared with MXene modified separator, the rate capability and cycling performance of Li-S battery with the MXene-based aerogel modified separator are largely enhanced. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available