4.6 Article

Research on Nb doping-coating composite modification of LiNiO2 cathode material for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 57, Issue 37, Pages 17722-17734

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-07777-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.OCEF.2021038]
  2. CITC-metal/CBMM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LiNiO2 was synthesized by co-precipitation method and modified with Nb2O5. The Nb-modified materials showed good layered structure and low Li-Ni mixing. The surface of the modified materials was more compact and smoother. The electrochemical performance test results demonstrated that Nb doping-coating composite modified materials significantly improved the cycle performance of LiNiO2, with N1 exhibiting the best performance.
LiNiO2 (LNO) was synthesized by co-precipitation method and then modified by Nb2O5. Doped material N0 (doping molar ratio is 1%), doped and coated composite modified materials N1 and N2 (doping molar ratio is 1%, coating molar ratio is 0.5% and 1%, respectively) were obtained. XRD results show that Nb modified materials have good layered structure and low Li-Ni mixing. SEM image shows that the surface of the modified materials is more compact and smoother. EDS and TEM diagrams indicate that N1 and N2 samples can be successfully doped and coated with Nb compound. The electrochemical performance test results show that the Nb doping-coating composite modified materials have a significant impact on the cycle performance of LiNiO2, among which N1 has the best cycle performance. In the voltage range of 2.75-4.3 V, the initial discharge specific capacity of N1 at 0.1 C is 221.20 mAh/g, which is about 20 mAh/g higher than that of LiNiO2 material. And the capacity retention rate of N1 is 80.70% after 100 cycles at 1 C, which is also much higher than that of LiNiO2 (67.46%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available