4.5 Article

Characterization of Anisotropic Fracture Behavior of 7075-T6 Aluminum Alloy Sheet under Various Stress States

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 3230-3252

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-07327-w

Keywords

anisotropic fracture; fracture characterization; high strength aluminum alloy; sheet metals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anisotropic fracture behavior of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy sheet was investigated through tensile tests and digital image correlation technique. The results showed the influence of loading directions and stress state on failure strains. Fracture morphology was observed to understand the failure model and mechanisms. An anisotropic fracture model based on DF2016 was used to describe the fracture behavior. Additionally, the impact of plastic anisotropy on the formability of the sheet was examined.
The anisotropic fracture of the 7075-T6 aluminum alloy sheet was investigated under various stress states. Tensile tests using specimens with various shapes were conducted along different loading directions to understand the anisotropic fracture behavior of the 7075-T6 sheet over a wide range of stress states. The failure strains as a function of loading directions and stress state were evaluated using the digital image correlation (DIC) technique. The fracture morphology was observed at the macroscale and microscopic to probe the failure model and fracture mechanisms of the 7075-T6 aluminum alloy sheet. The anisotropic fracture behavior of the alloy was described using a DF2016-based anisotropic fracture model. Meanwhile, the effect of plastic anisotropy on the formability of the 7075-T6 sheet was examined using both quadratic and non-quadratic yield functions. The constructed anisotropic fracture loci, fracture envelopes, and fracture forming limit diagrams reasonably characterized the anisotropic fracture behavior of the 7075-T6 sheet over a wide range of loading conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available