4.7 Article

Genetic algorithm-assisted data-driven model for boundary shear distribution and stage-discharge: Compound open channel flows

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 615, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128564

Keywords

Boundary shear; Apparent shear; Compound open channel flow; Stage-discharge; Genetic algorithm

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. XJTLU
  3. [11772270]
  4. [RDF-16-02-02]
  5. [PGRS2012007]
  6. [REF-20-02-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new model is proposed in this paper to calculate the percentage shear force carried by floodplains, which is simple and accurate and suitable for a wide range of applications.
In this paper, a unified method has been proposed for the percentage shear force carried by floodplains using fewer non-dimensional parameters such as the floodplain's percentage area, the ratio of Manning's roughness and the depth ratio. This new data-driven dynamic model for percentage shear force is obtained using a genetic algorithm (GA) program, a well-documented machine-learning software, which can examine the existing rela-tionship among the variables and explore the influencing factors. GA facilitated a unified relationship between apparent shear force and the chosen parameters. The new proposed model is simple and accurate compared to the previous models, which were either complex or distinct for different configurations. The efficiency of the new model shows that the most predicted test case results are under the 5% error cap. The cohesive expression derived for smooth and roughened compound channels is the most significant advantage of the GA-based data -driven model, providing a simple and easy-use formula for engineers to apply for broad applications. Compared with the other available approaches, the model proposed provides the most accurate discharge prediction for various unique datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available