4.1 Article

Natural history of elbow flexion and forearm rotation contractures in obstetric brachial plexus injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1121-1127

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17531934221121912

Keywords

Brachial plexus; birth injury; elbow; forearm; contracture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A prospective database study was conducted to investigate the severity and progression of elbow and forearm contractures in patients with obstetric brachial plexus injury. The study found that the degree of fixed flexion in the elbow was related to the patient's group, and poorer active shoulder abduction was a significant risk factor for severe contractures. As the injury severity increased, both active and passive pronation and supination tended to decrease. These findings provide valuable insights for the treatment of obstetric brachial plexus injury.
A prospective database study was undertaken to investigate the severity and progression of elbow and forearm contractures in patients with obstetric brachial plexus injury. One-hundred and fifty-nine patients, who had not undergone nerve repair (mean age 12 years at last follow-up) (56 Narakas Group 1, 66 Group 2, 27 Group 3, 10 Group 4) were studied. Mean fixed flexion of the elbow at last follow-up was 13 degrees for Group 1, 15 degrees for Group 2, 19 degrees for Group 3 and 24 degrees for Group 4. Severe contracture of 30 degrees or more developed in 31 children (mean age 118 months), with poorer active shoulder abduction being a significant risk factor. Onset of contracture was before the age of 5 years but did not increase substantially beyond 12 years. Active and passive pronation and supination tended to decrease with increasing injury severity. Seventeen children developed severe restriction of passive pronation (supination contracture) (mean age 69 months), and 12 developed severe restriction of passive supination at a mean of 137 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available