4.1 Review

Latinx attitudes, barriers, and experiences with genetic counseling and testing: A systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 166-181

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1632

Keywords

acculturation; barriers; communication; decision-making; disparities; genetic counseling; genetic testing; Hispanic; Latinx; patient experience; systematic review; underrepresented populations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review examined research literature on Latinx experiences with genetic counseling and testing. It found that Latinx patients faced significant barriers to accessing genetic services, including costs, referrals, and communication. Providers' implicit biases negatively impacted their care and communication. Despite low awareness of cancer genetic testing, Latinx patients often expressed interest in learning more about genetic counseling and testing or unmet needs for testing discussion and provider involvement.
As genetics is increasingly used across clinical settings, there is a need to understand the impact and experiences of diverse patients. This review systematically examined research literature on Latinx experiences with genetic counseling and genetic testing (GC/GT) in the United States, synthesizing key themes and knowledge gaps pertaining to both patient experience and hypothetical scenarios. Findings were based on a systematic search, inclusion, and thematic analysis of 81 empirical peer-reviewed articles published from January 1990 to July 2019 pertaining to Latinx populations and GC/GT. Studies most commonly addressed Latinas' perspectives on GC/GT in prenatal settings or for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Costs, referrals, and communication were significant barriers to accessing genetic services for many Latinx patients, particularly those with low English proficiency (LEP). Studies highlighted difficulties accessing and communicating in healthcare settings, and how medical context and prior experience with healthcare workers and institutions influenced GC/GT decision-making. Providers' implicit biases about Latinx patients negatively impacted their care and impeded communication. Despite low awareness of cancer GT, Latinx patients often reported interest in learning more about GC/GT or unmet needs for GT discussion and provider involvement. This systematic review identified areas where providers can take action to improve Latinx experiences with GC/GT. Clinicians should elicit and respond to patient preferences about shared decision-making. For patients with low numeracy or LEP, providers should consider tailored educational and communication techniques. Most studies focused on HBOC and prenatal testing, and Latinx patients are heterogeneous, leaving many research questions about Latinx experience with GT/GC in other clinical areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available