4.7 Article

EBF1 primes B-lymphoid enhancers and limits the myeloid bias in murine multipotent progenitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 219, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20212437

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome [206328/Z/17/Z, 203151/Z/16/Z]
  2. Blood Cancer UK [18002]
  3. Cancer Research UK [C1163/A21762]
  4. Max Planck Society
  5. UKRI Medical Research Council [MC_PC_17230]
  6. Wellcome Trust [206328/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study implicates EBF1 in regulating myeloid/lymphoid fate bias in MPPs by constraining C/EBP alpha-driven myelopoiesis and priming the B-lymphoid fate specifically in MPP3 cells.
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and multipotent progenitors (MPPs) generate all cells of the blood system. Despite their multipotency, MPPs display poorly understood lineage bias. Here, we examine whether lineage-specifying transcription factors, such as the B-lineage determinant EBF1, regulate lineage preference in early progenitors. We detect low-level EBF1 expression in myeloid-biased MPP3 and lymphoid-biased MPP4 cells, coinciding with expression of the myeloid determinant C/EBP alpha. Hematopoietic deletion of Ebf1 results in enhanced myelopoiesis and reduced HSC repopulation capacity. Ebf1-deficient MPP3 and MPP4 cells exhibit an augmented myeloid differentiation potential and a transcriptome with an enriched C/EBP alpha signature. Correspondingly, EBF1 binds the Cebpa enhancer, and the deficiency and overexpression of Ebf1 in MPP3 and MPP4 cells lead to an up- and downregulation of Cebpa expression, respectively. In addition, EBF1 primes the chromatin of B-lymphoid enhancers specifically in MPP3 cells. Thus, our study implicates EBF1 in regulating myeloid/lymphoid fate bias in MPPs by constraining C/EBP alpha-driven myelopoiesis and priming the B-lymphoid fate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available