4.7 Article

A multi-omics analysis of blood-brain barrier and synaptic dysfunction in APOE4 mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 219, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20221137

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [5P01AG052350, R01NS034467]
  2. Foundation Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence for the Study of Perivascular Spaces in Small Vessel Disease [16CVD05]
  3. Cure Alzheimer's Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

APOE4 leads to early disruption of the blood-brain barrier and subsequent synaptic dysfunction and behavioral deficits. Changes in signaling mechanisms related to this process were revealed through RNA sequencing and proteome analysis.
Apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4), the main susceptibility gene for Alzheimer's disease, leads to blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown in humans and mice. Remarkably, BBB dysfunction predicts cognitive decline and precedes synaptic deficits in APOE4 human carriers. How APOE4 affects BBB and synaptic function at a molecular level, however, remains elusive. Using single-nucleus RNA-sequencing and phosphoproteome and proteome analysis, we show that APOE4 compared with APOE3 leads to an early disruption of the BBB transcriptome in 2-3-mo-old APOE4 knock-in mice, followed by dysregulation in protein signaling networks controlling cell junctions, cytoskeleton, clathrin-mediated transport, and translation in brain endothelium, as well as transcription and RNA splicing suggestive of DNA damage in pericytes. Changes in BBB signaling mechanisms paralleled an early, progressive BBB breakdown and loss of pericytes, which preceded postsynaptic interactome disruption and behavioral deficits that developed 2-5 mo later. Thus, dysregulated signaling mechanisms in endothelium and pericytes in APOE4 mice reflect a molecular signature of a progressive BBB failure preceding changes in synaptic function and behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available