4.4 Article

Biofouling assemblages on anthropogenic structures reflect seafloor access for benthic predators

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2022.151796

Keywords

Anthropogenic structures; Biodiversity; Community structure; Marinas; Predation; Prey refuge

Funding

  1. Canadian Aquatic Invasion Species Network II (CAISN II)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  3. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO)
  4. Transport Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The design of anthropogenic marine structures can have unintended consequences for ecological communities. This study examines the differences in biofouling communities between pontoons and pilings in a marina in British Columbia, Canada. The results show that crawling benthic predators are more abundant on pilings, and there are differences in taxonomic composition and non-indigenous species between the two habitats, primarily due to the dominance of mussels on pontoons. The study suggests that contact with the seafloor is the key driver of these differences in biofouling communities.
The design of anthropogenic marine structures can have unintended consequences for ecological communities. We describe differences in biofouling assemblages between two primary anthropogenic habitats-pontoons and pilings-in a marina in British Columbia, Canada, using multiple measures of diversity (i.e., richness, evenness, and Shannon indices) and multiple metrics of variability in taxonomic composition (i.e., Jaccard and modified Gower methods) using two complementary surveys. First, a video-transect survey revealed abundances of crawling benthic predators to be 19 times greater on pilings than on pontoons. Second, a photo-quadrat survey of sessile invertebrates revealed moderate differences in diversity but differences of 86% in taxonomic composition and 88% in non-indigenous species (NIS), owing largely to the dominance of mussels (Mytilus species complex) on pontoons and their absence on pilings. We discuss several environmental factors associated with the design of anthropogenic infrastructure and propose that contact with the seafloor is the key driver of observed differences between the biofouling assemblages at this site. Contact with the seafloor permits access to crawling predators and thereby drives the abundances of ecosystem-engineering taxa. Patterns of taxonomic composition and assemblage dispersion indicate that biofouling organisms are affected by these phenomena according to their roles either as prey or as competitors with mussels and not whether they are native or NIS. Finally, we consider how the growing body of ecological studies on biofouling communities such as ours can inform the implementation of infrastructure for the purposes of enhancing biotic diversity and resilience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available