Journal
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115920
Keywords
Fuel break networks; Fuel treatment optimization; Cost efficiency; Mediterranean wildfires; Wildfire simulation
Categories
Funding
- FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. [UI/BD/150755/2020]
- FCT [UI/BD/150755/2020, PCIF/GRF/0204/2017]
- [1382 (DL 57/2016/CP1382/CT0003)]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the planned fuel break network (FBN) in Portugal in meeting fire management objectives, costs, and benefits. The results showed a potential reduction in the annual burned area due to large fires, the annual number of exposed residential buildings, and the annual burned area in protected areas. However, the effectiveness of the FBN varied among segments and the current implementation sequence was suboptimal. Additional landscape-scale fuel reduction strategies are needed to meet short-term national wildfire management targets.
Despite growing interest in developing extensive fuel treatment programs to prevent catastrophic wildfires in the Mediterranean region, there is little information on the projected effectiveness of fuel treatments in terms of avoided exposure and risk. In Portugal, a fuel management plan aiming to prevent loss of lives, reduce large fires (>500 ha), and reduce annual burned area is under implementation, with particular emphasis on the nation-wide fuel break network (FBN). In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the planned FBN in terms of meeting fire management objectives, costs, and benefits. We first estimated the overall effectiveness of the FBN at intersecting modeled large fires (>500 ha) and at reducing exposure to protected areas and residential buildings using wildfire simulation modeling. Then, the fuel break burn-over percentage, i.e. the percentage of fires that are not contained at the FBN, was modeled as a function of pre-defined flame length thresholds for individual FBN segments. For the planned FBN, the results suggested a potential reduction of up to 13% in the annual burned area due to large fires (ca. 13,000 ha), of up to 8% in the annual number of residential buildings exposed (ca. 100 residential buildings), and up to 14% in the annual burned area in protected areas (ca. 2400 ha). The expected burn-over percentage was highly variable among the segments in response to estimated fire intensity, and an average decrease of 40% of the total benefits was estimated. The most important fuel breaks typically showed a higher percentage of fire burn-over, and hence reduction in effectiveness. We also showed that the current implementation of FBN follows a random sequence, suboptimal for all objectives. Our results suggest that additional landscape-scale fuel reduction strategies are required to meet short-term national wildfire manage-ment targets.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available