4.6 Article

Neutrino mass and mass ordering: no conclusive evidence for normal ordering

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/010

Keywords

Bayesian reasoning; neutrino properties; neutrino masses from cosmology; cosmological parameters from CMBR

Funding

  1. European Union [754496]
  2. INFN project [GRANT73/Tec-Nu]
  3. Italian Space Agency (ASI) [201624-H.0, 2016-24-H.1-2018]
  4. Spanish grants [PID2020113644GB-I00, PROMETEO/2019/083]
  5. European ITN project HIDDeN [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019/860881-HIDDeN]
  6. Jeff and Gail Kodosky Endowed Chair in Physics at the University of Texas, Austin
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics program at the University of Texas, Austin [DE-SC-0022021]
  8. Vetenskapsradet (Swedish Research Council) at Stockholm University [6382013-8993]
  9. Ministero dell'Istruzione, Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR) [2017X7X85K]
  10. AEI [PID2020-113775GB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extraction of neutrino mass ordering is a major challenge in particle physics and cosmology. Recent claims regarding the preference for normal ordering of neutrino mass spectrum are investigated and no decisive evidence is found. The significance in favor of normal mass ordering is currently moderate, driven mostly by neutrino oscillation data.
The extraction of the neutrino mass ordering is one of the major challenges in particle physics and cosmology, not only for its implications for a fundamental theory of mass generation in nature, but also for its decisive role in the scale of future neutrinoless double beta decay experimental searches. It has been recently claimed that current oscillation, beta decay and cosmological limits on the different observables describing the neutrino mass parameter space provide robust decisive Bayesian evidence in favor of the normal ordering of the neutrino mass spectrum [1]. We further investigate these strong claims using a rich and wide phenomenology, with different sampling techniques of the neutrino parameter space. Contrary to the findings of Jimenez et al. [1], no decisive evidence for the normal mass ordering is found. Neutrino mass ordering analyses must rely on priors and parameterizations that are ordering-agnostic: robust results should be regarded as those in which the preference for the normal neutrino mass ordering is driven exclusively by the data, while we find a difference of up to a factor of 33 in the Bayes factors among the different priors and parameterizations exploited here. An ordering-agnostic prior would be represented by the case of parameterizations sampling over the two mass splittings and a mass scale, or those sampling over the individual neutrino masses via normal prior distributions only. In this regard, we show that the current significance in favor of the normal mass ordering should be taken as 2.7 sigma (i.e. moderate evidence), mostly driven by neutrino oscillation data. Let us stress that, while current data favor NO only mildly, we do not exclude the possibility that this may change in the future. Eventually, upcoming oscillation and cosmological data may (or may not) lead to a more significant exclusion of IO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available