4.6 Review

Individuals with hearing impairment/deafness during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review on communication challenges and strategies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Volume 32, Issue 15-16, Pages 4454-4472

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16572

Keywords

barriers; communication difficulties; COVID-19; deafness; hearing impairment; limitations; sign language; strategies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study summarizes the communication challenges faced by individuals with hearing impairment during the COVID-19 pandemic and proposes strategies to overcome these challenges. The main challenges identified include face mask use, physical and social distancing, and issues related to information, education, rehabilitation, and healthcare accessibility. The consequences of these challenges include social isolation, loneliness, lack of knowledge about prevention, and mental health issues. Strategies such as using transparent face masks, employing basic interaction skills, improving the availability of sign language interpreters, allowing the presence of family members, and teaching healthcare professionals sign language basics are recommended to mitigate these challenges.
Aims and objectives This study aimed (a) to identify the communication issues and problems faced by individuals with hearing impairment (HI)/deafness during the COVID-19 pandemic and (b) to describe strategies to overcome the issues/problems and/or prevent their negative impact. Background Individuals with mild or severe HI face everyday communication problems, which have been worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no studies have summarised the available evidence to better understand the communication challenges faced by them and strategies allowing better interactions. The long duration of the outbreak-more than 2 years, with policies that have just been lifted in some countries-and the possible return of restrictions in the next Winter suggest the need to summarise evidence in the field. Design and methods A rapid review is reported here in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Medline, CINAHL and Scopus databases were searched, including (a) primary or secondary studies published from January 2020 to 12 January 2022, (b) involving individuals with HI/deafness, (c) during the COVID-19 pandemic and (d) written in English. Data were extracted and summarised by using a content analysis approach. Patient or public contribution No Patient or Public Contribution. Results Fourteen studies were included as follows: three non-systematic reviews, seven cross-sectional, three quasi- experimental and one qualitative study, performed mainly in the US and the UK. Face mask covering use; physical and social distancing; and information, education, rehabilitation, and healthcare accessibility have emerged as the main challenges triggering consequences such as social isolation, loneliness, poor knowledge regarding the prevention and mental health issues. Strategies mitigating these challenges are as follows: (a) adopting transparent face masks, (b) using basic skills while interacting (e.g. maintaining eye contact), (c) improving the availability of sign language interpreters, (d) allowing the presence of family members and (e) teaching basics of sign language to healthcare professionals. Conclusions and relevance to clinical practice Individuals with HI/deafness live with several challenges, suggesting that their vulnerability has increased tremendously during the COVID-19 pandemic. The effectiveness of strategies to overcome these difficulties should be scrutinised by conducting more research. Moreover, there should be increased awareness among all citizens by equipping them with simple strategies to communicate effectively with individuals with HI, an approach that may increase inclusiveness and prevent further negative consequences and burden.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available