4.6 Review

Review finds core outcome set uptake in new studies and systematic reviews needs improvement

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Respiratory System

ERS statement: a core outcome set for clinical trials evaluating the management of COPD exacerbations

Alexander G. Mathioudakis et al.

Summary: This study has developed a core outcome set for the management of acute exacerbations of COPD, which aims to improve the quality and comparability of clinical trials. Through systematic reviews and interviews, the most important outcomes were identified and prioritized through a Delphi survey and consensus meetings. The core outcome set includes outcomes such as survival, treatment success, breathlessness, and quality of life, and has been deemed non-burdensome for patients and health professionals to use.

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL (2022)

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

Outcome selection for tissue-agnostic drug trials for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review of core outcome sets and regulatory guidance

Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi et al.

Summary: This review aims to identify and map core outcome sets (COS) for tissue-agnostic drug therapies in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The study found that outcomes such as disease activity, pain, fatigue, and quality of life were recommended across most conditions. Similarities and differences were also observed in the recommendations of the US FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA). The findings emphasize the need for collaboration between regulators and COS developers to enhance outcome selection in innovative trials.

TRIALS (2022)

Review Environmental Sciences

Usefulness of Cochrane Reviews in Clinical Guideline Development-A Survey of 585 Recommendations

Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen et al.

Summary: The Danish Health Authority utilizes Cochrane reviews in the development of clinical recommendations, with nearly one-third of evidence-based recommendations incorporating evidence from Cochrane reviews, according to a study reviewing guidelines published between 2014 and 2021.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study

Alice M. Biggane et al.

Summary: Patient and public involvement plays an important role in clinical guideline development, but currently, their input is limited, particularly in health outcome selection. However, meaningful involvement can be achieved through the role of the committee chair, training and support, plain language, and the opportunity for all members to engage.

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

In-depth qualitative interviews identified barriers and facilitators that influenced chief investigators' use of core outcome sets in randomised controlled trials

Karen L. Hughes et al.

Summary: This study aimed to investigate barriers and facilitators to the uptake of core outcome sets (COS) in randomized controlled trials. Based on qualitative interviews with UK chief investigators, facilitators to uptake include investigator behavior and the wider research system, while barriers to uptake include perceived characteristics of COS and issues in the COS development process. Recommendations to improve COS uptake include engagement with the research community, involving patients in COS development, and ensuring COS remain up to date.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health

Karen L. Hughes et al.

Summary: This review aimed to assess the uptake of core outcome sets (COS) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) across different areas of health. The results showed that there is a wide variation in the uptake of COS, with barriers including lack of validated measures and involvement of key stakeholders. Further studies are needed to explore the implementation of COS in a wider range of disease categories and to identify barriers and facilitators to uptake.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Use of core outcome sets was low in clinical trials published in major medical journals

Karen Matvienko-Sikar et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists

Chiara Bellucci et al.

Summary: This study examined clinical trialists' knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of Core Outcome Sets (COS). Results showed that while 65% of participants were familiar with COS, only about half of them had used COS in trials. Main barriers to using COS included poor knowledge and difficulties in identifying relevant COS, while main enablers included clear understanding and perceived importance of COS.

TRIALS (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets

Ian J. Saldanha et al.

Summary: This study aimed to assess the relevance of Core Outcome Sets (COS) in systematic reviews (SRs), with most SRs having relevant COS and a majority of outcomes matching between COS and SRs. Consideration of COS appears useful for SR planning.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Realising the full potential of data-enabled trials in the UK: a call for action

Matthew R. Sydes et al.

Summary: Clinical trials are the gold standard for testing interventions, and the overlap between trial data and data in electronic healthcare records offers opportunities for innovative ways to decrease duplication of effort and accelerate trial processes. This could ultimately lead to better, faster, and more efficient trials for patient benefit.

BMJ OPEN (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A scoping review of core outcome sets and their 'mapping' onto real-world data using prostate cancer as a case study

Michela Meregaglia et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2020)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Core outcome sets through the healthcare ecosystem: the case of type 2 diabetes updates mellitus

Susanna Dodd et al.

TRIALS (2020)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Producing and using timely comparative evidence on drugs: lessons from clinical trials for covid-19

Huseyin Naci et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement

Jamie J. Kirkham et al.

TRIALS (2019)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

The increasing complexity of the core outcomes landscape

Rachael M. Moloney et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Industry funding was associated with increased use of core outcome sets

Jamie J. Kirkham et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome sets

Karen L. Hughes et al.

PLOS ONE (2019)

Article Rheumatology

Engaging Stakeholders and Promoting Uptake of OMERACT Core Outcome Instrument Sets

Sean R. Tunis et al.

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY (2017)

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

Paula R. Williamson et al.

TRIALS (2017)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations

Jamie J. Kirkham et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2017)

Article Pharmacology & Pharmacy

How aligned are the perspectives of EU regulators and HTA bodies? A comparative analysis of regulatory-HTA parallel scientific advice

Giovanni Tafuri et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY (2016)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Towards evidence based research

Hans Lund et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Towards evidence based research

Hans Lund et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research

Sean R. Tunis et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2016)

Editorial Material Obstetrics & Gynecology

The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health

Khalid Khan

BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2014)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials: Still a Problem

Roderik F. Viergever et al.

PLOS ONE (2014)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials

An-Wen Chan et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2013)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

An-Wen Chan et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)

Review Rheumatology

Clinical outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: A systematic literature review

Penelope Esther Palominos et al.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2012)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

What Is Value in Health Care?.

Michael E. Porter

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2010)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

Iain Chalmers et al.

LANCET (2009)

Article Statistics & Probability

Bias in meta-analysis due to outcome variable selection within studies

JL Hutton et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS (2000)