4.7 Article

Environmental hotspot analysis of primary copper production in China and its future improvement potentials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 370, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133458

Keywords

Primary copper production; Environmental impact; Life cycle assessment (LCA); LCA weighting; ?????LCA normalization; Environmental improvement

Funding

  1. International Copper Association, Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of copper in China has significant environmental impacts, particularly in terms of global warming potential. This study utilized globally harmonized LCA methodologies and facility-level data to analyze the environmental profile of copper production in China, identifying key contributing factors and prioritizing environmental issues.
The production of resources e.g., copper (Cu) has induced many environmental issues worldwide, due to the growing demand to satisfy the world growing population. China, as the largest Cu production country in the world, deserves a special attention. However, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-based environmental profile of Cu produced in China remains unclear due to insufficient representativeness, inconsistency of methodologies applied, and absence of reliable upstream datasets. In the present study, this critical gap was filled using globally harmonized LCA methodologies and facility-level data, technologically representing 77% of China's total Cu production capacity, with consideration of environmental burden embedded in upstream raw materials. Envi-ronmental issues were prioritized using LCA weighting and normalization method, while key contributing factors were identified via Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). Weighted and normalized results showed that Global Warming Potential (GWP) was found to be the priority issue whose contribution to the overall environmental impact reached up to 47%. LCIA results demonstrated that the environmental impacts of China Cu production were primarily caused by production process of raw materials (51%-66%), followed by fuels used for transport by sea and land (11%-22%) and electricity consumption (5%-12%), depending on impact categories. Based on the study results and the importance of GWP, special attention was given to energy systems and direct GWP relevant emissions, by investigating smelting technologies. Five ways towards a more environmentally improved Cu industry associated with the challenges to be addressed were put forward in the outlook (e.g., the use of green electricity can effectively reduce CO2 emission by 14%-29%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available