4.5 Article

Kinesin-1 transports morphologically distinct intracellular virions during vaccinia infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.260175

Keywords

Vaccinia virus; Kinesin-1; Microtubule transport; In vitro motility assays

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that intracellular mature viruses (IMVs) and intracellular enveloped viruses (IEVs) can undergo microtubule-based motility and recruit the kinesin-1 motor protein for transport. IMVs are the first and most abundant infectious form of vaccinia virus during its replication cycle. These findings provide insights into the transport mechanism of the virus.
Intracellular mature viruses (IMVs) are the first and most abundant infectious form of vaccinia virus to assemble during its replication cycle. IMVs can undergo microtubule-based motility, but their directionality and the motor involved in their transport remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that IMVs, like intracellular enveloped viruses (IEVs), the second form of vaccinia that are wrapped in Golgi-derived membranes, recruit kinesin-1 and undergo anterograde transport. In vitro reconstitution of virion transport in infected cell extracts revealed that IMVs and IEVs move toward microtubule plus ends with respective velocities of 0.66 and 0.56 mu m/ s. Quantitative imaging established that IMVs and IEVs recruit an average of 139 and 320 kinesin-1 motor complexes, respectively. In the absence of kinesin-1, there was a near-complete loss of in vitro motility and reduction in the intracellular spread of both types of virions. Our observations demonstrate that kinesin-1 transports two morphologically distinct forms of vaccinia. Reconstitution of vaccinia-based microtubule motility in vitro provides a new model to elucidate how motor number and regulation impacts transport of a bona fide kinesin-1 cargo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available