4.7 Article

Flavonoids as promising anticancer agents: an in silico investigation of ADMET, binding affinity by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
Volume 41, Issue 16, Pages 7835-7846

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2126397

Keywords

Anticancer; ADMET and physicochemical properties; flavonoids; molecular docking; molecular dynamics; multi-drug resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flavonoids have shown potential as excellent anti-tubulin agents for cancer treatment, and this study provides strong evidence for their effectiveness through in silico ADMET analysis, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation.
Cancer is one of the most concerning diseases to humankind. Various treatment strategies are being employed for its treatment, out of which use of natural products is an essential one. Flavonoids have proven to be promising anticancer targets since decades. Also, tubulin is a significant biological target for the development of anticancer agents due to its crucial role in mitosis and abundance throughout the body. In the current study, in silico ADMET parameters of 104 flavonoids were examined, followed by molecular docking with the colchicine binding site of Tubulin protein (PDB; Id 4O2B). The best conformation from each flavonoid subcategory with the best docking score (MolDock score) was further subjected to 100 ns of molecular dynamics to investigate the protein-ligand complex's stability. Different parameters such as RMSD, RMSF, rGy and SASA were calculated for the six flavonoids using molecular dynamic studies. The top most compound from all the six subcategories of flavonoids elicited best behavior in the colchicine binding site of Tubulin protein. This in silico study employing molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation provides strong evidence for flavonoids to be excellent anti-tubulin agents for the treatment of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available