4.6 Article

Indentation response of model oxide dispersion strengthening alloys after ion irradiation up to 700 °C

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 132, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0092138

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VEGA
  2. [VEGA 1/0477/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an experimental investigation of irradiation-induced evolutions in three different oxide dispersion strengthening alloys. It documents and interprets the dose-dependent changes in particle size and number density, as well as evaluates the corresponding micro-mechanical changes in the alloys.
This paper presents an experimental investigation of irradiation-induced evolutions in three different oxide dispersion strengthening (ODS) alloys. High-dose, dual beam Ni-He ion irradiations are carried out up to 700 degrees C. The significant dose-dependent changes in the ODS particle size and number density are documented and interpreted in terms of specific point defect transport mechanisms, from small angle neutron scattering, TEM, and pulsed low-energy positron system measurements combined. The corresponding micro-mechanical changes in the alloys are evaluated based on the indentation response, which is, in turn, interpreted in terms of related, sub-grain plasticity mechanisms. The room temperature tests (without dwell time) reveal that the microscale work-hardening rate increases with decreasing the particle number density and pronounced strain localization effect. The elevated temperature tests (up to 600 degrees C, with dwell time) show that the indentation creep compliance is mostly temperature-independent after irradiation up to 25 dpa at T-irr = 500 degrees C and markedly temperature-dependent, after irradiation beyond 40 dpa at T-irr = 600 degrees C. This effect is ascribed to particular creep mechanisms associated with indent-induced plasticity, i.e., high stress and high dislocation density conditions. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available