4.7 Article

More Easily Cultivated Than Identified: Classical Isolation With Molecular Identification of Vaginal Bacteria

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages S21-S28

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw192

Keywords

bacterial vaginosis; anaerobes; cultivation; vagina

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R01 HG005816-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) have complex communities of anaerobic bacteria. There are no cultivated isolates of several bacteria identified using molecular methods and associated with BV. It is unclear whether this is due to the inability to adequately propagate these bacteria or to correctly identify them in culture. Methods. Vaginal fluid from 15 women was plated on 6 different media using classical cultivation approaches. Individual isolates were identified by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing and compared with validly described species. Bacterial community profiles in vaginal samples were determined using broad-range 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing. Results. We isolated and identified 101 distinct bacterial strains spanning 6 phyla including (1) novel strains with <98% 16S rRNA sequence identity to validly described species, (2) closely related species within a genus, (3) bacteria previously isolated from body sites other than the vagina, and (4) known bacteria formerly isolated from the vagina. Pyrosequencing showed that novel strains Peptoniphilaceae DNF01163 and Prevotellaceae DNF00733 were prevalent in women with BV. Conclusions. We isolated a diverse set of novel and clinically significant anaerobes from the human vagina using conventional approaches with systematic molecular identification. Several previously uncultivated bacteria are amenable to conventional cultivation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available