4.5 Article

Monitoring Alzheimer's Disease Progression in Mild Cognitive Impairment Stage Using Machine Learning-Based FDG-PET Classification Methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 1493-1502

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220585

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; brain metabolism; FDG PET; machine learning

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN2016-05964]
  2. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  3. DOD ADNI (Department of Defense) [W81XWH12-2-0012]
  4. National Institute on Aging
  5. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  6. AbbVie
  7. Alzheimer's Association
  8. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  9. Araclon Biotech
  10. BioClinica, Inc.
  11. Biogen
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  13. CereSpir, Inc.
  14. Cogstate
  15. Eisai Inc.
  16. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  17. Eli Lilly and Company
  18. EuroImmun
  19. F. HoffmannLa Roche Ltd
  20. company Genentech, Inc.
  21. Fujirebio
  22. GE Healthcare
  23. IXICO Ltd.
  24. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.
  25. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.
  26. Lumosity
  27. Lundbeck
  28. Merck Co., Inc.
  29. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.
  30. NeuroRx Research
  31. Neurotrack Technologies
  32. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  33. Pfizer Inc.
  34. Piramal Imaging
  35. Servier
  36. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  37. Transition Therapeutics
  38. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  39. St. Boniface Hospital Research Foundation [1406-3216, 1410-3216]
  40. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) [PJT162144]
  41. Honourable Douglas and Patricia Everett
  42. Royal Canadian Properties Limited Endowment Fund [1403-3131]
  43. Alzheimer's Society of Manitoba
  44. Research Manitoba

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the efficacy of the MAD framework in tracking brain metabolic changes in the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease, with the GLM algorithm showing excellent performance in distinguishing between sMCI and pAD patients two years prior to diagnosis. Significant increases in MAD scores were identified in pAD, particularly close to diagnosis, and were associated with cognitive decline.
Background: We previously introduced a machine learning-based Alzheimer's Disease Designation (MAD) framework for identifying AD-related metabolic patterns among neurodegenerative subjects. Objective: We sought to assess the efficiency of our MAD framework for tracing the longitudinal brain metabolic changes in the prodromal stage of AD. Methods: MAD produces subject scores using five different machine-learning algorithms, which include a general linear model (GLM), two different approaches of scaled subprofile modeling, and two different approaches of a support vector machine. We used our pre-trained MAD framework, which was trained based on metabolic brain features of 94 patients with AD and 111 age-matched cognitively healthy (CH) individuals. The MAD framework was applied on longitudinal independent test sets including 54 CHs, 51 stable mild cognitive impairment (sMCI), and 39 prodromal AD (pAD) patients at the time of the clinical diagnosis of AD, and two years prior. Results: The GLM showed excellent performance with area under curve (AUC) of 0.96 in distinguishing sMCI from pAD patients at two years prior to the time of the clinical diagnosis of AD while other methods showed moderate performance (AUC: 0.7-0.8). Significant annual increment of MAD scores were identified using all five algorithms in pAD especially when it got closer to the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), but not in sMCI. The increased MAD scores were also significantly associated with cognitive decline measured by Mini-Mental State Examination in pAD (q < 0.01). Conclusion: These results suggest that MAD may be a relevant tool for monitoring disease progression in the prodromal stage of AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available