4.7 Article

Chikungunya Virus: In Vitro Response to Combination Therapy With Ribavirin and Interferon Alfa 2a

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 214, Issue 8, Pages 1192-1197

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw358

Keywords

chikungunya virus; interferon alfa; ribavirin; antiviral combination therapy

Funding

  1. Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Florida
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health [P41-EB001978]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. We evaluated the antiviral activities of ribavirin (RBV) and interferon (IFN) alfa as monotherapy and combination therapy against chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Methods. Vero cells were infected with CHIKV in the presence of RBV and/or IFN alfa, and viral production was quantified by plaque assay. A mathematical model was fit to the data to identify drug interactions for effect. We ran simulations using the best-fit model parameters to predict the antiviral activity associated with clinically relevant regimens of RBV and IFN alfa as combination therapy. The model predictions were validated using the hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) system. Results. RBV and IFN alfa were effective against CHIKV as monotherapy at supraphysiological concentrations. However, RBV and IFN alfa were highly synergistic for antiviral effect when administered as combination therapy. Simulations with our mathematical model predicted that a standard clinical regimen of RBV plus IFN alfa would inhibit CHIKV burden by 2.5 log(10) following 24 hours of treatment. In the HFIM system, RBV plus IFN alfa at clinical exposures resulted in a 2.1-log(10) decrease in the CHIKV burden following 24 hours of therapy. These findings validate the prediction made by the mathematical model. Conclusions. These studies illustrate the promise of RBV plus IFN alfa as a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of CHIKV infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available