4.7 Article

Contrasting response on magnetocaloric effect and refrigeration capacity due to Ni or Mn substitution by Fe in Ni-Mn-In-Co-Fe alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 934, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167852

Keywords

Magnetocaloric effect; Magnetic entropy change; Refrigeration capacity; Heusler alloys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By adjusting the composition of the alloys, martensitic transformation near room temperature and large magnetocaloric effect and refrigeration capacity were achieved. Despite similar crystal structures and lattice parameters, there were significant differences in the magnetocaloric response under the applied magnetic field.
We set the composition of two Ni-Mn-In-Co-Fe alloys as (Ni46.8Fe1.2)Co2Mn36.5In13.5 and Ni48Co2(Mn34.5Fe2) In13.5 in order to display the martensitic transformation near to room temperature. Under a magnetic field change of 5 T the polycrystalline low Co content alloys displayed a large magnetocaloric effect ASMag of 15.5 and 20.0 Jkg-1K-1; and giant refrigeration capacity RCFWHM up to 422 and 292 Jkg-1 for (Ni46.8Fe1.2)Co2Mn36.5In13.5 and Ni48Co2(Mn34.5Fe2)In13.5, respectively. The XRD patterns showed cubic L21 structure with space group 225 in both alloys and via Rietveld refinement negligible differences were found in lattice parameter of 0.598(7) and 0.598(9) nm for (Ni46.8Fe1.2)Co2Mn36.5In13.5 and Ni48Co2(Mn34.5Fe2) In13.5, respectively. Nevertheless, the magnetocaloric response in the alloys exhibited remarkable dissim-ilarities. Whilst the applied magnetic field shifted the martensitic transformation - 3.4 KT-1 in the Ni48Co2(Mn34.5Fe2)In13.5 alloy this sensibility increased up to - 6.8 KT-1 in the (Ni46.8Fe1.2)Co2Mn36.5In13.5 alloy; consequently the span in the Full Width Half Maximum of the ASMag(T) curve was 17 and 32 K, respectively.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available