4.7 Article

High cycling stability graphite cathode modified by artificial CEI for potassium-based dual-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 918, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165436

Keywords

Dual-ion batteries; Artificial; Cathode electrolyte interface; Graphite

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874079, 51804035, 11775226]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2018501091, E2020501001, E2021501029]
  3. Hebei Province Key Research and Development Plan Project [19211302D]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2023040, N2123035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A surface modification strategy is developed to improve the cycling stability of graphite cathodes in dual-ion batteries by forming an artificial cathode electrolyte interface (CEI) layer. The modified graphite cathode with the artificial CEI layer exhibits significantly better cycling stability and maintains a thin and uniform morphology after 100 cycles.
Expanded graphite is the most common cathode for dual-ion batteries (DIBs), although graphite cathode suffers from a poor cycle life due to decomposition of the solid cathode electrolyte interface (CEI). Herein, a kind of surface modification strategy is developed to improve the cycling stability of graphite by forming artificial CEI on the cathode surface. Expanded graphite cathode modified by an artificial CEI layer can stably deliver a discharge capacity of 56.1 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles, which is obviously better than that of the pristine graphite cathode. The artificial CEI layer can still maintain a thin and uniform morphology after 100 cycles, which is beneficial to protect the interface between graphite and electrolyte and improve the stable intercalation/deintercalation of ions. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available