4.7 Article

Insights on phase formation from thermodynamic calculations and machine learning of 2436 experimentally measured high entropy alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 915, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165173

Keywords

High entropy alloys; CALPHAD; High-throughput calculations; Phase selection rules; Machine learning

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI) [2004979]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [2004979] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study employed CALPHAD and machine learning approaches to analyze phase formation in high entropy alloys. CALPHAD showed good capabilities in predicting phase formation, and it was found that atomic size difference between elements affects phase formation. Machine learning algorithms were also used to study phase selection rules, achieving high prediction accuracies.
Both CALPHAD (CALculation of PHAse Diagrams) and machine learning (ML) approaches were employed to analyze the phase formation in 2436 experimentally measured high entropy alloy (HEA) compositions consisting of various quinary mixtures of Al, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Ni. CALPHAD was found to have good capabilities in predicting the BCC/B2 and FCC phase formation for the 1761 solid-solution-only compositions, excluding HEAs containing an amorphous phase (AM) or/and intermetallic compound (IM). Phase selection rules were examined systematically using several parameters and it was revealed that valence electron concentration (VEC) < 6.87 and VEC > 9.16 are the conditions for the formation of single-phase BCC/B2 and FCC, respectively; and CALPHAD could predict this with essentially 100% accuracy. Both CALPHAD predictions and experimental observations show that more BCC/B2 alloys are formed over FCC alloys as the atomic size difference between the elements increases. Four ML algorithms, decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN), were employed to study the phase selection rules for two different datasets, one consisting of 1761 solid-solution (SS) HEAs without AM and/or IM phases, and the other set consisting of all the 2436 HEA compositions. Cross validation (CV) was performed to optimize the ML models and the CV accuracies are found to be 90.4%, 94.1%, 93.8%, 89.7% for DT, KNN, SVM, and ANN respectively in predicting the formation of BCC/B2, BCC/B2 + FCC, and FCC; and 92.9%, 96.3%, 96.9%, 92.3% for DT, KNN, SVM, and ANN respectively in predicting SS, AM, SS + AM, and IM phases. Sixty-six experimental bulk alloys with SS structures are predicted with the trained ANN model, and the accuracy reaches 80.3%. VEC was found to be most important parameter in phase prediction for BCC/B2, BCC/B2 + FCC, and FCC phases. Electronegativity difference and FCC-BCC-index (FBI) are the two dominating features in determining the formation of SS, AM, SS + AM, and IM. A separation line delta H-mix = 29 x VEC - 247 was found in the delta H-mix-vs-VEC plot to predict the formation of single-phase BCC/B2 or FCC with a 96.2% accuracy (delta H-mix = mixing enthalpy). These insights will be very valuable for designing HEAs with targeted crystal structures. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available