4.7 Article

Functional Validation of the Roles of Cytochrome P450s in Tolerance to Thiamethoxam and Imidacloprid in a Field Population of Aphis gossypii

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 70, Issue 45, Pages 14339-14351

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04867

Keywords

neonicotinoids; cytochrome P450; functional validation; resistance; Aphis gossypii

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Talent Foundation of Jilin University
  3. [32072457]
  4. [31772188]
  5. [419080520317]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field populations of Aphis gossypii have developed high resistance to neonicotinoids and the involvement of multiple cytochrome P450 genes in this resistance has been identified.
Field populations of Aphis gossypii (SDR) have evolved high resistance to neonicotinoids, including thiamethoxam and imidacloprid. Synergism bioassays and transcriptomic comparison of the SDR and susceptible (SS) strains revealed that the cytochrome P450s may contribute to the neonicotinoid resistance evolution. The transcripts of some P450s were constitutively overexpressed in the SDR strain, and many genes showed expression plasticity under insecticide exposure. Drosophila that ectopically expressed CYPC6Y9, CYP4CK1, CYP6DB1, and CYP6CZ1 showed greater resistance (>8.0-fold) to thiamethoxam, and Drosophila that expressed CYPC6Y9, CYP6CY22, CYP6CY18, and CYP6D subfamily genes showed greater resistance (>5-fold) to imidacloprid. Five P450 genes that caused thiamethoxam resistance also conferred resistance to a-cypermethrin. Furthermore, the knockdown of CYP4CK1, CYP6CY9, CYP6CY18, CYPC6Y22, CYP6CZ1, and CYP6DB1 dramatically increased the sensitivity of the SDR strain to thiamethoxam or imidacloprid. These results indicate the involvement of multiple P450 genes, rather than one key gene, in neonicotinoid resistance in field populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available