4.4 Article

Relation between Low Elastic Limit and Mobile Dislocation Density in Ultra-low Carbon Martensitic Steel

Journal

ISIJ INTERNATIONAL
Volume 62, Issue 10, Pages 2000-2007

Publisher

IRON STEEL INST JAPAN KEIDANREN KAIKAN
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2022-196

Keywords

martensite; dislocation density; mobile dislocation; elastic limit; stress relaxation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress relaxation tests were conducted to analyze the effect of mobile dislocations on the low elastic limit of an ultralow carbon martensitic steel. The tests showed that the movement of mobile dislocations significantly reduced the stress. Additionally, 5% cold rolling suppressed relaxation and increased the elastic limit.
Stress relaxation tests were conducted in the elastic region of an ultralow carbon martensitic steel (Fe-18%Ni alloy) to quantitatively analyze the effect of mobile dislocations on the low elastic limit of the steel. The elastic limit of the as-quenched material was measured at 255 MPa, although its tensile strength was as high as 720 MPa. The stress relaxation tests, which were performed at 255 MPa, revealed a remarkable stress reduction due to the movement of the mobile dislocations present in the as-quenched material. The total dislocation density barely changed during the test, while the distribution parameter (M-value) decreased significantly, indicating that the mobile dislocations exhibited stable arrangements. The 5% cold rolling before the relaxation tests suppressed the relaxation and simultaneously increased the elastic limit to a maximum, 435 MPa. By estimating the mobile dislocation density by relating the stress reduction in the stress relaxation tests to the distance of the dislocation movement evaluated via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations, it was estimated that the mobile dislocation density of the 5%-cold-rolled material was lowered to similar to 1/10 of that of the as-quenched material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available