A case-study of wildland fire management knowledge exchange: the barriers and facilitators in the development and integration of the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in Ontario, Canada

Background. Among the most successful examples of Knowledge Exchange (KE) between researchers and practitioners in Canadian wildland fire management is the development and integration of the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS) into operational use. Aims. Our aim was to identify key factors for this success. Methods. Through a case study, we investigated historical KE of two CFFDRS components in Ontario, Canada. We held semi-structured interviews with principal Canadian Forest Service researchers and Ontario fire management practitioners active in development and implementation of CFFDRS from the late 1960s to 2010s. Keyresults. The importance of both formal and informal facilitators to support KE was emphasised. Conclusion. Participants were most likely to associate successful implementation with informal facilitators such as personal relationships, shared field-based experiences, and opportunities for dialogue between researchers and practitioners. Critical to success were the credibility and soft skills of the knowledge brokers, early engagement, and consideration of training needs for end users in the design of products.

Automated summary

This research emphasizes the importance of both formal and informal facilitators to support Knowledge Exchange in the successful implementation of the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS) in wildland fire management in Ontario, Canada. Key factors for success included personal relationships, shared field-based experiences, and opportunities for dialogue between researchers and practitioners.