4.6 Article

Axisymmetric V-bending: A single experiment to determine the fracture strain and weakest sheet material direction for plane strain tension

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111813

Keywords

Ductile fracture; Plane strain tension; Anisotropic; Stress triaxiality; Axisymmetric; Bending

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new axisymmetric V-bending technique is proposed to identify the strain to fracture for plane strain tension for the weakest in-plane direction of sheet metal. Experimental results show that the method is robust and exhibits low sensitivity to geometric imperfections. Experiments on different materials validate the proposed technique through comparison with conventional methods.
Most metals exhibit a critical minimum in ductility for plane strain tension. The fracture strain for this particular state of loading is an important reference point for the calibration of ductile fracture models. Here, an axisymmetric V-bending technique is proposed to identify the strain to fracture for plane strain tension for the weakest in-plane direction of sheet metal. After clamping the center and outer boundary of a disc specimen onto an axisymmetric fixture, the specimen is drawn over a tubular knife until fracture initiates on the specimen surface. Throughout the experiment, the specimen surface is monitored with a digital camera for timely crack detection and strain measurement by planar Digital Image Correlation (DIC). It is shown through numerical simulations that the experimental setup is remarkably robust with the results exhibiting a low sensitivity to geometric imperfections. Experiments are performed on aluminum AA2024 and two dual phase steels (DP780 and DP 980) to demonstrate the validity of the proposed technique through comparison with conventional Vbending and dihedral mini-Nakazima experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available