4.7 Article

Predictive factors for pneumonia development and progression to respiratory failure in MERS-CoV infected patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 468-475

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.08.005

Keywords

Predictive factor; Pneumonia; Respiratory failure; Disease progression; Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus

Funding

  1. Samsung Biomedical Research Institute (SBRI) grant [SMX1161321]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: After the 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in Korea, prediction of pneumonia development and progression to respiratory failure was emphasized in control of MERS outbreak. Methods: MERS-CoV infected patients who were managed in a tertiary care center during the 2015 Korean MERS outbreak were reviewed. To analyze predictive factors for pneumonia development and progression to respiratory failure, we evaluated clinical variables measured within three days from symptom onset. Results: A total of 45 patients were included in the study: 13 patients (28.9%) did not develop pneumonia, 19 developed pneumonia without respiratory failure (42.2%), and 13 progressed to respiratory failures (28.9%). The identified predictive factors for pneumonia development included age >= 45 years, fever >= 37.5 degrees C, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, CRP >= 2 mg/dL, and a threshold cycle value of PCR less than 28.5. For respiratory failure, the indicators included male, hypertension, low albumin concentration, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and CRP >= 4 mg/dL (all P < 0.05). With >= two predictive factors for pneumonia development, 100% of patients developed pneumonia. Patients lacking the predictive factors did not progress to respiratory failure. Conclusion: For successful control of MERS outbreak, MERS-CoV infected patients with >= two predictive factors should be intensively managed from the initial presentation. (C) 2016 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available