4.4 Review

Auditory event-related potentials in separating patients with depressive disorders and non-depressed controls: A narrative review

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 119-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.07.003

Keywords

Auditory P3; Biomarker; Depressive disorder; Loudness dependence of auditory evoked; potentials; Mismatch negativity

Funding

  1. Finnish Cultural Foundation [00200466]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This narrative review presents the findings on the differences in auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) between patients with depressive disorder and non-depressed control subjects. The results suggest potential alterations in sensory-cognitive processing in depressive disorders and the use of ERPs in clinical applications.
This narrative review brings together the findings regarding the differences in the auditory event-related po-tentials (ERPs) between patients with depressive disorder and non-depressed control subjects. These studies' results can inform us of the possible alterations in sensory-cognitive processing in depressive disorders and the potential of using these ERPs in clinical applications. Auditory P3, mismatch negativity (MMN) and loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) were the subjects of the investigation. A search in PubMed yielded 84 studies. The findings of the reviewed studies were not highly consistent, but some patterns could be identified. For auditory P3b, the common findings were attenuated amplitude and prolonged latency among depressed patients. Regarding auditory MMN, especially the amplitude of duration deviance MMN was commonly attenuated, and the amplitude of frequency deviance MMN was increased in depressed patients. In LDAEP studies, generally, no differences between depressed patients and non-depressed controls were reported, although some group differences concerning specific depression subtypes were found. This review posits that future research should investigate whether certain stimulus conditions are particularly efficient at separating depressed and non-depressed participant groups. Future studies should contrast responses in different sub -populations of depressed patients, as well as different clinical groups (e.g., depressive disorder and anxiety disorder patients), to investigate the specificity of the auditory ERP alterations for depressive disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available