4.3 Article

A non-invasive method for the assessment of gingival thickness in the aesthetic zone and the concept of the gingival geometric ratio in an Asian population

Journal

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.08.005

Keywords

Dental implants; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Dental esthetics; Gingiva; Cone-beam computed tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to investigate gingival thickness and biologic width in the aesthetic zone of an Asian population. The study introduced the gingival geometric ratio as a new parameter for assessing soft tissue stability and predicting aesthetic outcomes. The results showed that most central incisors had thick gingivae, while thin gingivae were more prevalent in lateral incisors. The majority of the facial gingival tissues of both central and lateral incisors were categorized as low crest.
The aim of this study was to investigate the gingival thickness and biologic width in the aesthetic zone (maxillary central and lateral incisors) in an Asian population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a non-invasive measurement method, prior to immediate implant placement. The gingival geometric ratio is introduced as a new parameter for assessing soft tissue stability and hence predicting the aesthetic outcome. The gingival thickness, biologic width category (normal, high, and low crest), and gingival geometric ratio (shape and configuration of the gingival tissues) were assessed for 171 central and 175 lateral incisors on high-resolution CBCT images. Thick gingivae were found in 93.6% of the central incisors and 64% of the lateral incisors (P < 0.001). The difference in thickness between the central and lateral incisors was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Regarding the biologic width of the facial gingival tissue, the majority of central (64.8%) and lateral (64.3%) incisors were categorized as low crest (> 3 mm). The study found that most of the gingivae of the maxillary central incisors were thick, while thin gingivae were more prevalent in the lateral incisors. Therefore, an individual patient may have different gingival thickness types, and 'one individual, one gingival biotype' may not be true. Furthermore, the majority of the facial gingival tissues of the maxillary incisors were found to be low crest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available