4.7 Review

Nanotechnology: A Promising Approach for Cancer Diagnosis, Therapeutics and Theragnosis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 3735-3749

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S378074

Keywords

diagnosis; theragnosis cancer; nanotechnology; treatment; theragnostics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer is the most devastating disease worldwide, and current conventional diagnostic and therapeutic methods are not efficient. Nanotechnology holds promise for quick, safe, cost-effective, and efficient cancer diagnosis and treatment, providing simultaneous diagnosis and therapy.
Cancer remains the most devastating disease and the major cause of mortality worldwide. Although early diagnosis and treatment are the key approach in fighting against cancer, the available conventional diagnostic and therapeutic methods are not efficient. Besides, ineffective cancer cell selectivity and toxicity of traditional chemotherapy remain the most significant challenge. These limitations entail the need for the development of both safe and effective cancer diagnosis and treatment options. Due to its robust application, nanotechnology could be a promising method for in-vivo imaging and detection of cancer cells and cancer biomarkers. Nanotechnology could provide a quick, safe, cost-effective, and efficient method for cancer management. It also provides simultaneous diagnosis and treatment of cancer using nano-theragnostic particles that facilitate early detection and selective destruc-tion of cancer cells. Updated and recent discussions are important for selecting the best cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management options, and new insights on designing effective protocols are utmost important. This review discusses the application of nanotech-nology in cancer diagnosis, therapeutics, and theragnosis and provides future perspectives in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available