4.7 Article

Characterisation of Trichomonas vaginalis Isolates Collected from Patients in Vienna between 2019 and 2021

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012422

Keywords

Trichomonas vaginalis; Trichomonas vaginalis virus; Mycoplasma hominis; endosymbionts

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study characterized TV isolates from Austrian patients and found that 35% of the isolates carried TVV (TVV1, TVV2, or TVV3) and 28% of the isolates carried M. hominis. In some patients, M. hominis was detected both in the clinical samples and the respective TV isolates.
Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the causative agent of trichomoniasis, the most common nonviral sexually transmitted disease. TV can carry symbionts such as Trichomonas vaginalis virus (TVV) or Mycoplasma hominis. Four distinct strains of TV are known: TVV1, TVV2, TVV3, and TVV4. The aim of the current study was to characterise TV isolates from Austrian patients for the presence of symbionts, and to determine their effect on metronidazole susceptibility and cytotoxicity against HeLa cells. We collected 82 TV isolates and detected presence of TVV (TVV1, TVV2, or TVV3) in 29 of them (35%); no TVV4 was detected. M. hominis was detected in vaginal/urethral swabs by culture in 37% of the TV-positive patients; M. hominis DNA was found in 28% of the TV isolates by PCR. In 15% of the patients, M. hominis was detected in the clinical samples as well as within the respective TV isolates. In 22% of the patients, M. hominis was detected by culture only. In 11 patients, M. hominis was detected only within the respective cultured TV isolates (13%), while the swab samples were negative for M. hominis. Our results provide a first insight into the distribution of symbionts in TV isolates from Austrian patients. We did not observe significant effects of the symbionts on metronidazole susceptibility, cytotoxicity, or severity of symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available