4.7 Article

Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810912

Keywords

PAH; skeletal muscle; type II fibers; FoxO1

Funding

  1. NIH [1R01 HL 116573, 5T32HD09806104, 5T32HL007609-34]
  2. NHLBI R24 grant [R24HL123767]
  3. Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund (CMREF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe disease that requires improved therapies. A study on an animal model shows that PAH can cause skeletal muscle dysfunction, possibly due to a shift in skeletal muscle fiber-type specification.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious, progressive, and often fatal disease that is in urgent need of improved therapies that treat it. One of the remaining therapeutic challenges is the increasingly recognized skeletal muscle dysfunction that interferes with exercise tolerance. Here we report that in the adult rat Sugen/hypoxia (SU/Hx) model of severe pulmonary hypertension (PH), there is highly significant, almost 50%, decrease in exercise endurance, and this is associated with a 25% increase in the abundance of type II muscle fiber markers, thick sarcomeric aggregates and an increase in the levels of FoxO1 in the soleus (a predominantly type I fiber muscle), with additional alterations in the transcriptomic profiles of the diaphragm (a mixed fiber muscle) and the extensor digitorum longus (a predominantly Type II fiber muscle). In addition, soleus atrophy may contribute to impaired exercise endurance. Studies in L6 rat myoblasts have showed that myotube differentiation is associated with increased FoxO1 levels and type II fiber markers, while the inhibition of FoxO1 leads to increased type I fiber markers. We conclude that the formation of aggregates and a FoxO1-mediated shift in the skeletal muscle fiber-type specification may underlie skeletal muscle dysfunction in an experimental study of PH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available