4.7 Article

The Detectability of the Viral RNA in Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Tick-Borne Encephalitis

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169332

Keywords

tick-borne encephalitis; viremia; real-time PCR; molecular diagnostics

Funding

  1. Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Center), Poland [2018/31/B/NZ6/02744]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the detection of TBEV RNA in plasma may have diagnostic significance in the peripheral phase of TBE. The absence of TBEV RNA in the cerebrospinal fluid suggests a relatively low intrathecal viral burden.
Background: The detection rate of viral RNA in tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is low and variable between studies, and its diagnostic/prognostic potential is not well defined. We attempted to detect RNA of TBE virus (TBEV) in body fluids of TBE patients. Methods: We studied 98 adults and 12 children with TBEV infection, stratified by the disease phase and presentation. EDTA blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained upon hospital admission. RNA was extracted from freshly obtained plasma, concentrated leukocyte-enriched CSF, and whole blood samples, and real time PCR was performed with a Rotor-Gene Q thermocycler. Results: TBEV RNA was detected in (1) plasma of one (of the two studied) adult patients with an abortive infection, (2) plasma of two (of the two studied) adults in the peripheral phase of TBE, and (3) plasma and blood of an adult in the neurologic phase of TBE presenting as meningoencephalomyelitis. No CSF samples were TBEV RNA-positive. Conclusions: The detection of TBEV RNA in blood might be diagnostic in the peripheral phase of TBE. The lack of TBEV RNA in the CSF cellular fraction speaks against TBEV influx into the central nervous system with infiltrating leukocytes and is consistent with a relatively low intrathecal viral burden.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available