4.7 Article

Specificities of the DMD Gene Mutation Spectrum in Russian Patients

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112710

Keywords

DMD; Duchenne; Becker muscular dystrophy; selective screening program; mutation spectrum; DNA-diagnostics

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Russia, a selective screening program for DMD/BMD has been carried out, which revealed certain differences in the mutation spectrum of the DMD gene among Russian patients. The accurate mutation type plays a crucial role in determining specific therapeutic methods for patients.
Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD/BMD) is the most common form of muscular dystrophy, accounting for over 50% of all cases. In this regard, in Russia we carry out a program of selective screening for DMD/BMD, which mainly involves male patients. The main inclusion criteria are an increase in the level of creatine phosphokinase (>2000 U/L) or an established clinical diagnosis. At the first stage of screening, patients are scanned for extended deletions and duplications in the DMD gene using multiplex ligase-dependent probe amplification (MLPA SALSA P034 and P035 DMD probemix, MRC-Holland). The second stage is the search for small mutations using a custom NGS panel, which includes 31 genes responsible for various forms of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. In a screening of 1025 families with a referral Duchenne/Becker diagnosis, pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in the DMD gene were found in 788 families (in 76.9% of cases). In the current study, we analyzed the mutation spectrum of the DMD gene in Russian patients and noted certain differences between the examined cohort and the multi-ethnic cohort. The analysis of the DMD gene mutation spectrum is essential for patients with DMD/BMD because the exact mutation type determines the application of a specific therapeutic method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available