4.6 Article

Developing the Chinese Environmentally Extended Input-Output (CEEIO) Database

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 953-965

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12477

Keywords

China; database; environmental pressures; environmental satellite accounts; industrial ecology; input-output analysis

Funding

  1. Center for Chinese Studies at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  2. Dow Sustainability Fellows Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmentally extended input-output (EEIO) databases are increasingly used to examine environmental footprints of economic activities. Studies focusing on China have independently, repeatedly developed EEIO databases for China. These databases are usually not publicly available, leading to repeated efforts, inconsistent with one another using different approaches, of limited environmental accounts, and lacking transparency, preventing continuous updating. We developed a transparent, comprehensive, and consistent Chinese EEIO database covering a wide period of time (currently 1992, 1997, 2002, and 2007 for which benchmark input-output tables [IOTs] are available), sector classifications (original sector classifications in benchmark IOTs, a 45-sector classification commonly used in China's environmental and energy statistics, and a 91-sector classification with maximized sector resolution ensuring temporal consistence), and environmental satellite accounts for 256 types of resources and 30 types of pollutants in this study. Moreover, the environmental satellite accounts cover households in addition to sectors, allowing developing closed models. We make this database publicly available with open access for broader dissemination (www. ceeio. com). We demonstrate the database by evaluating environmental pressures of Chinese products in 2007. Comparisons of our database with previous studies validate its rationality and reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available