4.6 Article

Impact of Trade Openness and Sector Trade on Embodied Greenhouse Gases Emissions and Air Pollutants

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 494-505

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12455

Keywords

environmental economics; greenhouse gases (GHGs); industrial ecology; input-output analysis; international trade; trade and environment

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (MEXT) [26000001]
  2. Ministry of Environment
  3. JSPS
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15H05341, 15K12265]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05341, 15K12265, 26000001] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of goods and services generates greenhouse gases (GHGs) and air pollution both directly and through the activities of the supply chains on which they depend. The analysis of the latter-called embodied emissions-caused by internationally traded goods and services is the subject of this article. We find that trade openness increases embodied emissions in international trade (EET). We also examine the impact of sector trade on EET. By applying a fixed-effect model using large balanced panel data from 187 countries between 1990 and 2011, we determine that each unit of increase in trade openness results in a 10% to 23% increase in GHGs EET. The sector trade effect is also significant for the embodied emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, carbon monoxide, nonmethane volatile organic compounds, particulates and sulfur dioxide. Our findings also clearly indicate that the impact of the gross domestic product (GDP) on the embodied emissions in exports is positive, increasing emissions, but that it is negative on the embodied emissions in imports. We suggest that countries monitor trade sector emissions and trade openness to mitigate global embodied GHG emissions and air pollutants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available