4.7 Review

Transition regime between high-velocity and hypervelocity impact in metals-A review of the relevant phenomena for material modeling in ballistic impact studies

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104213

Keywords

Hypervelocity impact; Shock physics; Thermal impact effects; Metallic targets; Hydrocode simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work aims to address the extension of established modeling approaches for metals in terminal ballistics towards higher impact velocities, below the threshold of purely hydrodynamic behavior. The transition regime, characterized by the coexistence of different multi-physics phenomena, is of paramount interest and requires a thorough review of relevant literature for impact modeling of metals at velocities lying in this regime.
In this work, we attempt to address the question how established modeling approaches for metals in terminal ballistics can be extended towards higher impact velocities that are still below the threshold of purely hydrodynamic behavior. While at the upper bound of the high-velocity penetration regime the effects of material strength and failure are dominating, the ideal hydrodynamic behavior is still not achieved until velocities of several kilometers per seconds. As shown by the authors in a precedent work, this transition regime lies between about 2 to 9 km/s -for the most common metal combinations in impact research- and it is of paramount interest since characterized by the coexistence of different multi-physics phenomena with a gradual transition from effects dominated by strength to those connected with the increase of internal energy, such as thermal softening and melting. In order to assess the implications for material modeling at velocities moderately above the regime of terminal ballistics, here we perform an extensive review of related literature with a focus on the relevant phenomena for impact modeling of metals at velocities lying in the transition regime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available