4.7 Review

A review on graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)- metal organic framework (MOF) heterostructured photocatalyst materials for photo(electro)chemical hydrogen evolution

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 87, Pages 36784-36813

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.254

Keywords

g-C3N4; Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution; MOF-derived; Solar harvesting; Composite heterojunctions; Synergistic effect

Funding

  1. MLU Halle -Wittenberg
  2. BMBF [FKZ:03Z22HN11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterostructured photocatalysts based on graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted significant attention for solar water splitting and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. This review comprehensively discusses the structural properties and performance of these photocatalysts, and analyzes the advantages, challenges, and design considerations of heterogeneous photocatalysis mechanisms.
Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based heterostructured photocatalysts have recently attracted significant attention for solar water splitting and photocatalytic hydrogen (H-2) evolution, because of their alterable physicochemical, optical and electrical properties, such as tunable band structure, ultrahigh specific surface area and controllable pore size, defect formation and active sites. On the other hand, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) possess a favorable surface area, permanent porosity and adjustable structures that allow them to be suitable candidates for diverse applications. In this review, we therefore comprehensively discuss the structural properties of heterogeneous g-C3N4/MOF-based photocatalysts with a special emphasis on their photocatalytic performance regarding the mechanism of heterogeneous photocatalysis, including advantages, challenges and design considerations. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available