4.7 Article

Promoted catalytic vapor phase transfer hydrogenation of levulinic acid to γ-valerolactone by coordinated size effect and acid property of bimetallic Ni/CeO2 catalyst

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 15, Pages 23682-23697

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/er.8666

Keywords

biofuel; heterogeneous catalysis; Levulinic acid; Ni catalyst; gamma-Valerolactone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ni/CeO2 catalysts with different Ni loadings were prepared and characterized to investigate their effects on catalytic performance. The addition of Ni reduced the activation energy and improved the acidity, resulting in enhanced catalytic efficiency. Among the bimetallic catalysts, Ni/CeO2 showed the best performance and coke resistance.
A series of Ni/CeO2 catalysts with different Ni loadings was prepared by the impregnation method, and characterized by XRD, N-2 adsorption/desorption isotherms, H-2-TPR, H-2-TPD, NH3-TPD, Pyridine probed FT-IR, TEM, XPS, EPR, and TG to study the crystalline phase, porosity, redox, dispersion of metal species, acid property, chemical state of surface and coke. The addition of Ni decreased efficiently the apparent activation energy by more than 14%. The correlation analysis revealed that the loading of NiO had profound influences on particle size and acidity which need to be well coordinated to get good catalytic performance. In the hydrogenation of levulinic acid using formic acid as the hydrogen source, the 5Ni/CeO2 catalyst with moderate Ni particle size of 6.9 nm and appropriate acidic strength distribution (Strong/Weak = ca. 2.8) demonstrated superior catalytic performance with a levulinic acid conversion of 73% and a gamma-valerolactone selectivity of 90%. The 5Ni/CeO2 among the bimetallic catalysts showed the best coke resistance (0.32 g(C)/g(cat.)) despite the fact that coke deposition was still inevitable during the reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available