4.2 Article

Energy-Efficient approximate compressor design for error-resilient digital signal processing

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages 1555-1577

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207217.2022.2117854

Keywords

Arithmetic circuits; approximate computing; compressor; majority logic; digital signal processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes two approximate (4,2) compressors with power and delay improvements using error-correcting modules. The simulation results show that the proposed designs reduce delay, power, and energy consumption compared to existing compressors, and they also demonstrate robustness in the presence of significant process variations. The qualitative assessment of an inexact multiplier based on the proposed compressors indicates acceptable accuracy.
Approximate computing can be considered a well-promising method for improving the critical performance criteria, such as latency and power consumption at the cost of accuracy penalty. The (4,2) compressor is a vital block at the heart of various arithmetic circuits like multipliers. This paper proposed two approximate (4,2) compressors with power and delay improvements with the error-correcting module. The simulation results based on 7 nm FinFET technology show that the proposed designs compared to the most efficient related approximate (4,2) compressors, reduce delay, power, and energy consumption. Furthermore, according to the comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations, the robustness of the proposed designs in the presence of significant FinFET process variations compared to the previous compressors is proven. In addition, an image multiplication process assesses the effectiveness of the proposed approach in the qualitative assessment of the inexact multiplier. The obtained results indicate acceptable accuracy of inexact multiplier based on the proposed approximate (4,2) compressor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available