4.7 Article

Preparation of resistant glucan by high pressure processing (HPP) and enzymatic methods increases indigestibility

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 219, Issue -, Pages 150-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.173

Keywords

Resistant glucans; Structure; Indigestibility

Funding

  1. Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) [2020-cxy20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a novel method for producing high-quality resistant glucan by investigating its structural mechanism of indigestibility. High-pressure processing effectively eliminated crystal peaks and enhanced the efficiency of digestive enzymes. The presence of alpha-1,6 and 8 -linkages in resistant glucans hindered the hydrolysis of short chains, resulting in higher indigestibility.
This study describes a new method for producing high-quality resistant glucan by characterizing the structural mechanism of indigestibility. The structures and properties of resistant glucans were characterized before and after in vitro simulated digestion. The results demonstrated that high-pressure processing (HPP) led to the complete disappearance of crystal peaks and increased the efficiency of the two enzymes (alpha-amylase and transglucosidase). Moreover, alpha-1,6 and 8 -linkages were abundant in the connecting parts of the long and branching chains in the resulting resistant glucans, thus hindering the ability of digestive enzymes to hydrolyze short chains with a degree of polymerization (DP) & LE; 6. In addition, transglucosidase activity led to a higher proportion of short chains (DP 3-6), further promoting indigestibility. We demonstrated that, without rectifi-cation and decolorization, the dietary fiber content was > 75 %, and the degree of branching increased to 50.9 %, indicating higher indigestibility than that resistant glucans produced by traditional methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available