4.6 Article

Underwater laser micromachining of silicon in pressurized environment

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-10120-7

Keywords

Laser; Micromachining; Water; Pressure; Silicon

Funding

  1. Rajamangala University of Technology Isan [SKC2562REV114]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFE0110300]
  3. Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) under Fundamental Fund 2022 (Project: Advanced Materials and Manufacturing for Applications in New S-curve Industries)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study applied positive water pressure in underwater laser ablation to reduce the interference of gas bubbles, improve cut quality, and enhance removal rate. The results showed that higher water pressure led to cleaner cut surfaces and smaller heat-affected zones.
Optical interference caused by gas bubbles in water is of prime concern in underwater laser micromachining process since it importantly affects the quality of laser-ablated surface and material removal rate. This study applied positive water pressure in the underwater laser ablation with the attempts to reduce the bubble size, minimize the optical disturbance to the laser beam in water, and promote the cut quality. A nanosecond pulse laser was used for grooving a single-crystalline silicon wafer in a pressurized water environment. The effects of water pressure and average laser power on groove width, groove depth, size of heat-affected zone, and cut surface morphology were examined and discussed together with the analysis of laser beam refraction in water. The results revealed that the higher the water pressure, the cleaner the cut surface, and smaller heat-affected zone and higher aspect ratio of groove were obtained. The ablation technique proposed in this paper could be a promising method for scribing silicon and plausibly other semiconductor materials at high removal rate with high cut quality and negligible damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available