4.6 Review

The Latent Reservoir for HIV-1: How Immunologic Memory and Clonal Expansion Contribute to HIV-1 Persistence

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 197, Issue 2, Pages 407-417

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600343

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Martin Delaney Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication and Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (National Institutes of Health) [AI096113, 1U19AI096109]
  2. amfAR
  3. Foundation for AIDS Research Research Consortium on HIV Eradication Grant from the Foundation for AIDS Research [amFAR 108165-50-RGRL]
  4. Johns Hopkins Center for AIDS Research (National Institutes of Health) [P30AI094189]
  5. National Institutes of Health [AI43222, AI100119, AI106697, HL116136]
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-1 infection reduces plasma virus levels to below the limit of detection of clinical assays. However, even with prolonged suppression of viral replication with ART, viremia rebounds rapidly after treatment interruption. Thus, ART is not curative. The principal barrier to cure is a remarkably stable reservoir of latent HIV-1 in resting memory CD4(+) T cells. In this review, we consider explanations for the remarkable stability of the latent reservoir. Stability does not appear to reflect replenishment from new infection events but rather normal physiologic processes that provide for immunologic memory. Of particular importance are proliferative processes that drive clonal expansion of infected cells. Recent evidence suggests that in some infected cells, proliferation is a consequence of proviral integration into host genes associated with cell growth. Efforts to cure HIV-1 infection by targeting the latent reservoir may need to consider the potential of latently infected cells to proliferate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available