4.7 Article

Soft and hard hybrid balanced clustering with innovative qualitative balancing approach

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 613, Issue -, Pages 786-805

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.09.044

Keywords

Qualitative balancing; Balance -driven clustering; Balance -constrained clustering; Feature selection; Value criterion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reexamines the balance of clustering and proposes a hybrid qualitative balanced clustering method. By identifying and prioritizing key features, constructing a feature value criterion, and implementing the developed clustering approach, a balanced clustering with the highest value and the least cardinality or similar to other clusters is achieved.
K-means is a popular clustering method that has consistently failed to produce a balanced cluster structure. While changes in cardinality, variance, and density have arisen due to the importance of balancing in different fields, balancing has never been viewed from a qualitative viewpoint. The current paper takes a new look at cluster balancing by presenting a soft (balance-driven) and hard (balance-constrained) hybrid qualitative balanced clustering (SHHQBC). It starts by identifying and prioritizing key features using a random forest algorithm and the mean decrease in the Gini coefficient criterion. It then uses a weighted linear combination of features with the importance of above 25%, 50%, and 75% to construct a feature called value criterion. The developed clustering approach is then implemented to establish clusters with the highest value with the least cardinality or a value similar to other clusters. By implementing the SHHQBC on 14 different datasets, first soft clustering is implemented for all three cases and balanced conditions are checked. Hard clustering is then performed to make balanced conditions. Finally, the best-balanced case with the least objective function is selected. Formulating the value criterion facilitates the interpretation and labeling of clusters, and quantitative clustering criteria are improved. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available