4.6 Article

Potassium Iodide as an Amine Oxidation Inhibitor in CO2 Capture

Journal

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01571

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) through LANL
  2. [620701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews previous work on the use of potassium iodide (KI) as an inhibitor to minimize amine oxidation in post-combustion carbon capture (PCCC). The results show that KI is effective in reducing oxidation in bench-scale experiments, but loses its effectiveness in high-temperature cycling experiments. The study highlights the importance of testing oxidation inhibitors under realistic conditions and evaluating their viability on an industrial scale.
Amine oxidation presents a major barrier to the wide-scale deployment of amine scrubbing for post-combustion carbon capture (PCCC). This paper reviews previous work on the use of Inhibitor A (Inh A) to minimize amine oxidation, and this will be the first time Inh A has been identified as potassium iodide (KI). KI is effective at mitigating oxidation in monoethanolamine (MEA) and piperazine (PZ) at absorber conditions during bench-scale experiments. Bench-scale experiments with methyldiethanol-amine (MDEA) and PZ blends showed no oxidation inhibition from KI at absorber conditions. However, in bench-and pilot-scale experiments with high-temperature cycling, KI proved largely ineffective at mitigating the oxidation of MEA, MDEA, and PZ. While the inhibitor may change oxidation pathways during temperature cycling, such as catalyzing the oxidation of ethylenediamine (EDA) to ammonia, the addition of KI had no impact on the overall degradation rate of the amine solvent. Based on the results reported here, KI will not inhibit oxidation meaningfully in industrial PCCC. This work highlights the importance of testing oxidation inhibitors under realistic conditions to determine their viability on the industrial scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available