4.7 Article

Intersection Management Protocol for Mixed Autonomous and Human-Operated Vehicles

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 18315-18325

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3169658

Keywords

Protocols; Turning; Trajectory; Safety; Roads; Delays; Sensors; Autonomous systems; road traffic control; human in the loop

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel embedding protocol that allows the Hybrid Autonomous Intersection Management (H-AIM) protocol to operate concurrently with actuated and adaptive signal controllers. The proposed protocol extends H-AIM to handle operational uncertainty and ensures safety through a new method of computing safety bounds on signal timing. Experimental results show the feasibility and effectiveness of combining H-AIM with actuated controllers for various levels of connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) market penetration and different combinations of common signal control schemes.
This paper presents a novel embedding protocol that allows for safe and efficient operation of the Hybrid Autonomous Intersection Management (H-AIM) protocol concurrently with actuated and adaptive signal controllers. The proposed protocol extends H-AIM to allow it to cope with some operational uncertainty that is common in actuated signal controllers. A novel approach for computing safety bounds on signal timing is presented as a way of insuring safety in the face of demand uncertainty. Experimental results show the feasibility and effectiveness of combining H-AIM with actuated controllers for various levels of connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) market penetration and different combinations of common signal control schemes, namely, adaptive signal timing, fixed signal timing, and signal actuation. The benefits are presented in terms of delay improvement when common actuation protocols are used in conjunction with the H-AIM protocol. In contrast to previous reports, the results presented in this paper suggest that mixtures of turning movement assignments that are more permissive for CAVs and less permissive for human operated vehicles are often detrimental in terms of traffic delay. Nonetheless, when implemented on top of an actuated and adaptive controller, the extended H-AIM protocol is shown to never be detrimental while presenting statistically significant reductions in total delay when more than 15% of the traffic is composed of CAVs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available